SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk
90 Overall Score
vs
Samsung PM9A1 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2

Samsung PM9A1 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2

Samsung
45 Overall Score

Scores

Console
SanDisk
86
Samsung
23
Workstation
SanDisk
85
Samsung
44
Gaming
SanDisk
85
Samsung
48
Budget
SanDisk
72
Samsung
46
Laptop
SanDisk
66
Samsung
50
Portable
SanDisk
24
Samsung
12

Specifications

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100Samsung PM9A1
Drive
Capacity
8,000
1,000
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x4PCIe 3.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation5★3
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,900
3,500
Sequential Write (MB/s)
13,200
3,000
Random Read (IOPS)
2,200,000
500,000
Random Write (IOPS)
2,400,000
480,000
Hardware
NANDTLC★—
DRAM Cache✗—
ControllernCache 4.0—
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
4,800
No data
MTBF (hours)
1,750,000
No data
Warranty (years)5★—
Features
Heatsink✓★—
Hardware Encryption✓★—

Pros & Cons

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (89th percentile)89th %ile

Samsung PM9A1 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2

  • Strong random (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average social proof (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average feature (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average endurance (14th percentile)14th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

Scores 90 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 12 of 18 specs.

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 Better at:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation