SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk
89 Overall Score
vs
Inland TN320 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Inland TN320 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Inland
51 Overall Score

Scores

Console
SanDisk
86
Inland
18
Workstation
SanDisk
85
Inland
54
Gaming
SanDisk
85
Inland
39
Budget
SanDisk
72
Inland
42
Laptop
SanDisk
66
Inland
50
Portable
SanDisk
24
Inland
11

Specifications

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100Inland TN320
Drive
Capacity
8,000
256
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x4PCIe 3.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation5★3
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,900
2,000
Sequential Write (MB/s)
13,200
1,600
Random Read (IOPS)
2,200,000
No data
Random Write (IOPS)
2,400,000
No data
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗—
ControllernCache 4.0—
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
4,800
1,200
MTBF (hours)
1,750,000
2,000,000
Warranty (years)56★
Features
Heatsink✓★—
Hardware Encryption✓★—

Pros & Cons

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (89th percentile)89th %ile

Inland TN320 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong endurance (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Below average capacity (17th percentile)17th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

Scores 89 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 18 specs.

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 Better at:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation