SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

SanDisk
90 Overall Score
vs
Kingston KC3000

Kingston KC3000

Kingston
80 Overall Score

Scores

Console
SanDisk
86
Kingston
76
Workstation
SanDisk
85
Kingston
82
Gaming
SanDisk
85
Kingston
78
Budget
SanDisk
72
Kingston
76
Laptop
SanDisk
67
Kingston
70
Portable
SanDisk
24
Kingston
20

Specifications

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100Kingston KC3000
Drive
Capacity
8,000
1,000
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation5★4
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,900
7,000
Sequential Write (MB/s)
13,200
6,000
Random Read (IOPS)
2,200,000
900,000
Random Write (IOPS)
2,400,000
1,000,000
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗✓★
ControllernCache 4.0Phison E18
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
4,800
800
MTBF (hours)
1,750,000
1,800,000
Warranty (years)5★3
Features
Heatsink✓✓
Hardware Encryption✓★—

Pros & Cons

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (89th percentile)89th %ile

Kingston KC3000

  • Strong feature (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong random (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong endurance (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong speed (80th percentile)80th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

Scores 90 overall, wins 4 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 18 specs.

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 Better at:

GamingConsolePortableWorkstation

Kingston KC3000 Better at:

BudgetLaptop