Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32W

Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32W

Corsair
95 Overall Score
vs
Kingston KF572C38RSAK2-32

Kingston KF572C38RSAK2-32

Kingston
84 Overall Score

Scores

Gaming
Corsair
100
Kingston
91
Workstation
Corsair
100
Kingston
86
Budget
Corsair
100
Kingston
82
Laptop
Corsair
70
Kingston
62
Server
Corsair
46
Kingston
40

Specifications

Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32WKingston KF572C38RSAK2-32
Memory
TypeDDR5DDR5
Form FactorUDIMMUDIMM
Total Capacity
65,536
32,768
Modules22
Per Module
32,768
16,384
Pins288288
Performance
Speed
6,400
7,200
CAS Latency32★38
Timings32-40-40-8438-44-44
Voltage1.399999976158142★1.4500000476837158
Class
ECC✗✗
Registered✗✗
OC ProfileIntel XMP 3.0Intel XMP 3.0
Features
RGB✓✓
Heat Spreader✓✓

Pros & Cons

Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32W

  • Strong speed (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong capacity (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile

Kingston KF572C38RSAK2-32

  • Strong speed (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong latency (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong capacity (71st percentile)

Pricing

Kingston KF572C38RSAK2-32 is MX$9,296 cheaper (1.8x less).

Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32W0.004score per dollar
vs
Kingston KF572C38RSAK2-320.007score per dollar

Kingston KF572C38RSAK2-32 offers 1.8x better value for money

Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32W

Kingston KF572C38RSAK2-32

Verdict

★ Winner: Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32W

Scores 95 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 4 of 15 specs.

Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32W Better at:

BudgetGamingLaptopServerWorkstation

Also Consider