Team Group
Team Group
80 Overall Score
vs
Timetec 76TT16
Timetec
46 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
Team Group
72 out of 100 high confidence 50 reviews
This high-frequency DDR5 kit from TeamGroup receives mostly positive feedback for its performance and cooling, with many users successfully running it at advertised speeds on premium boards. However, a significant minority report stability issues, DOA units, and compatibility problems on certain motherboards, leading to a mixed but generally favorable sentiment.
Pros
- Excellent performance at high speeds
- Effective heat spreader cooling
- High-quality Hynix A-die bins
- Works well on premium boards
- Aesthetic design and colors
Cons
- Stability issues at rated speeds
- DOA units reported
- Compatibility issues with some motherboards
- PMIC voltage locked
- Price increased significantly
Performance at rated speed 12
Stability 5
Cooling 4
Compatibility 6
Build quality 3
Value for money 2
Timetec 76TT16
No customer feedback yet
Scores
Gaming
Budget
Workstation
Laptop
Server
Specifications
| Team Group | Timetec 76TT16 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR5★ | DDR3L |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | SODIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2 | 4★ |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 204 |
| Rank | — | 2Rx8 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 34 | 11★ |
| Timings | 34-42-42-84 | — |
| Voltage | 1.399999976158142 | 1.350000023841858★ |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 3.0, AMD EXPO | — |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | — |
| Heat Spreader | ✓★ | ✗ |
Pros & Cons
Team Group
- Strong speed (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong latency (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong feature (73rd percentile)
- Strong capacity (71st percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)
Timetec 76TT16
- Strong capacity (71st percentile)
- Strong social proof (66th percentile)
- Below average speed (14th percentile)14th %ile
Pricing
Team Group0.007score per dollar
vs
Timetec 76TT160.030score per dollar
Timetec 76TT16 offers 4.3x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Team Group
Scores 80 overall, wins 4 of 5 usage categories and 4 of 16 specs.
