HyperX FURY
HyperX
30 Overall Score
vs
Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A
Crucial
61 Overall Score
Scores
Budget
Gaming
Workstation
Laptop
Server
Specifications
| HyperX FURY | Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR3 | DDR4★ |
| Form Factor | DIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 1 | 1 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 240 | 288 |
| Rank | — | 1Rx8 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 10★ | 22 |
| Timings | 10-10-10 | 22-22-22 |
| Voltage | 1.5 | 1.2000000476837158★ |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Automatic Overclocking | Intel XMP 2.0 |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✓★ | ✗ |
Pros & Cons
HyperX FURY
- Strong latency (73rd percentile)
- Below average speed (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average capacity (23rd percentile)
- Below average social proof (26th percentile)
Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
Verdict
Winner: Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A
Scores 61 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 5 of 16 specs.