Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 2025
Samsung
92 Overall Score
vs
ASUS ROG Strix XG27ACMG 27" negro
ASUS
81 Overall Score
Scores
Office
Creative
Gaming
Professional
Entertainment
Portable
Specifications
| Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" | ASUS ROG Strix XG27ACMG 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 27" | 27" |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | QD-OLED★ | IPS |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 500 Hz★ | 270 Hz |
| Response Time | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ | 1 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium Pro | G-Sync Compatible★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 300 nits | 400 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 99% (CIE1976) | 95% DCI-P3, 125% sRGB |
| Color Depth | 10-bit★ | 8-bit |
| HDR | HDR10+ | DisplayHDR 400 |
| HDR Support | HDR10+★ | HDR400 |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2★ | 1 |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | 3★ | 1 |
| Speakers | ✗ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pivot | ✓ | ✓ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | ✗ |
| Power | 140W | 30W★ |
| Weight | 6.90 kg | 6.49 kg★ |
Pros & Cons
Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 2025
- Strong performance (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
ASUS ROG Strix XG27ACMG 27" negro
- Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong color (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong performance (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong social proof (75th percentile)
Pricing
Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 20250.007score per dollar
vs
ASUS ROG Strix XG27ACMG 27" negro0.017score per dollar
ASUS ROG Strix XG27ACMG 27" negro offers 2.4x better value for money
Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 2025
ASUS ROG Strix XG27ACMG 27" negro
Verdict
Winner: Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27"
Scores 92 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 7 of 28 specs.
