Yattberak PD152KPNM 15.6"

Yattberak PD152KPNM 15.6"

Yattberak
30 Overall Score
vs
HP OMEN 27qs G2 27" Black

HP OMEN 27qs G2 27" Black

HP
86 Overall Score

Scores

Office
Yattberak
39
HP
80
Gaming
Yattberak
17
HP
76
Professional
Yattberak
20
HP
75
Creative
Yattberak
15
HP
72
Entertainment
Yattberak
16
HP
67
Portable
Yattberak
65
HP
12

Specifications

Yattberak PD152KPNM 15.6"HP OMEN 27qs G2 27"
Display
Size15.6"27"
Resolution1920 x 10802560 x 1440
Panel TypeIPSIPS
Aspect Ratio16:916:9
Curved—✗
Performance
Refresh Rate—280 Hz★
Response Time—1 ms★
Adaptive Sync—G-Sync Compatible★
Color & HDR
Brightness230 nits400 nits★
Color Gamut—95 percent
HDR—DisplayHDR 400
HDR Support—HDR400
Connectivity
HDMI Ports—2★
DisplayPort—1★
Thunderbolt—N/A
Speakers—✗
Headphone Jack—✓★
Ergonomics
Height Adjustable—✓★
Tilt✓✓
Swivel—✓★
Pivot✓✓
VESA Mount75x75100x100
Features
Webcam—✗
Touchscreen—✗
Power—106W★
Weight1.13 kg★8.35 kg

Pros & Cons

Yattberak PD152KPNM 15.6"

  • Strong portability (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong ergonomic (68th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (67th percentile)
  • Below average color (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average connectivity (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average display (22nd percentile)
  • Below average performance (23rd percentile)

HP OMEN 27qs G2 27" Black

  • Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong ergonomic (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong performance (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

Pricing

Yattberak PD152KPNM 15.6" is MX$11,501 cheaper (8.8x less).

Yattberak PD152KPNM 15.6"0.020score per dollar
vs
HP OMEN 27qs G2 27" Black0.007score per dollar

Yattberak PD152KPNM 15.6" offers 2.9x better value for money

Yattberak PD152KPNM 15.6"

HP OMEN 27qs G2 27" Black

Verdict

★ Winner: HP OMEN 27qs G2 27"

Scores 86 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 26 specs.

Yattberak PD152KPNM 15.6" Better at:

Portable

HP OMEN 27qs G2 27" Better at:

GamingOfficeCreativeProfessionalEntertainment

Also Consider