BenQ MOBIUZ EX240N 23.8" Black
BenQ
49 Overall Score
vs
Alienware AW-Series AW3225DM 32" Interstellar Indigo
Alienware
81 Overall Score
Scores
Gaming
Office
Entertainment
Creative
Professional
Portable
Specifications
| BenQ MOBIUZ EX240N 23.8" | Alienware AW-Series AW3225DM 32" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 23.8" | 32" |
| Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | VA | VA |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | — | ✓ |
| Curvature | — | 1,500 |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 165 Hz | 180 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium★ | FreeSync |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 250 nits | 400 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 16.7 Million Colors | DCI-P3 95% |
| HDR | HDR10 | DisplayHDR 400 |
| HDR Support | — | HDR400 |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 1 | 2★ |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | — | 0★ |
| Thunderbolt | No | — |
| Speakers | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | — | ✗ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | — | ✓★ |
| Tilt | — | ✓★ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | — | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | — | ✗ |
| Power | — | 33W★ |
| Weight | 5.53 kg★ | 9.19 kg |
Pros & Cons
BenQ MOBIUZ EX240N 23.8" Black
- Strong connectivity (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong performance (78th percentile)
- Strong feature (72nd percentile)
- Strong portability (69th percentile)
- Below average display (12th percentile)12th %ile
Alienware AW-Series AW3225DM 32" Interstellar Indigo
- Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong feature (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong color (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average portability (15th percentile)15th %ile
Pricing
BenQ MOBIUZ EX240N 23.8" Black0.014score per dollar
vs
Alienware AW-Series AW3225DM 32" Interstellar Indigo0.010score per dollar
BenQ MOBIUZ EX240N 23.8" Black offers 1.4x better value for money
BenQ MOBIUZ EX240N 23.8" Black
Alienware AW-Series AW3225DM 32" Interstellar Indigo
Verdict
Winner: Alienware AW-Series AW3225DM 32"
Scores 81 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 7 of 26 specs.
