ASUS XG34WCDMTG
ASUS
74 Overall Score
vs
Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 2025
Samsung
92 Overall Score
Scores
Office
Creative
Gaming
Professional
Entertainment
Portable
Specifications
| ASUS XG34WCDMTG | Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 34" | 27" |
| Resolution | 3440 x 1440 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | QD-OLED | QD-OLED |
| Aspect Ratio | 21:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✓ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz | 500 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 0.029999999329447746 ms | 0.029999999329447746 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | G-Sync Compatible★ | FreeSync Premium Pro |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 400 nits★ | 300 nits |
| Color Gamut | 99% DCI-P3 | 99% (CIE1976) |
| Color Depth | — | 10-bit★ |
| HDR | Dolby Vision | HDR10+ |
| HDR Support | Dolby Vision | HDR10+★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | 1 | 3★ |
| Speakers | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | — | ✓★ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pivot | ✓ | ✓ |
| VESA Mount | — | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | — | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | — | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | — | ✗ |
| Power | — | 140W★ |
| Weight | 8.80 kg | 6.90 kg★ |
Pros & Cons
ASUS XG34WCDMTG
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong color (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong feature (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong connectivity (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average social proof (14th percentile)14th %ile
Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 2025
- Strong performance (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
Pricing
ASUS XG34WCDMTG0.002score per dollar
vs
Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 20250.007score per dollar
Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 2025 offers 3.5x better value for money
ASUS XG34WCDMTG
Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 2025
Verdict
Winner: Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27"
Scores 92 overall, wins 3 of 6 usage categories and 7 of 28 specs.
