ASUS XG34WCDMTG
ASUS
74 Overall Score
vs
Acer Predator X32 Xbmiipphuzx 32" Black 2026
Acer
84 Overall Score
Scores
Gaming
Entertainment
Office
Creative
Professional
Portable
Specifications
| ASUS XG34WCDMTG | Acer Predator X32 Xbmiipphuzx 32" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 34" | 31.5" |
| Resolution | 3440 x 1440 | 3840 x 2160 |
| Panel Type | QD-OLED | OLED |
| Aspect Ratio | 21:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✓ | ✓ |
| Curvature | — | 1,700 |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Response Time | 0.029999999329447746 ms | 0.029999999329447746 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | G-Sync Compatible★ | FreeSync Premium |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 400 nits | 1000 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 99% DCI-P3 | DCI-P3 99% |
| Color Depth | — | 10-bit★ |
| HDR | Dolby Vision | DisplayHDR True Black 400 |
| HDR Support | Dolby Vision | HDR |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 2★ |
| USB-C | 1 | 1 |
| Speakers | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headphone Jack | — | ✓★ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pivot | ✓★ | ✗ |
| VESA Mount | — | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | — | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | — | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | — | ✗ |
| Power | — | 285W★ |
| Weight | 8.80 kg | 6.69 kg★ |
Pros & Cons
ASUS XG34WCDMTG
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong color (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong feature (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong connectivity (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average social proof (14th percentile)14th %ile
Acer Predator X32 Xbmiipphuzx 32" Black 2026
- Strong color (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong display (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (94th percentile)94th %ile
Pricing
ASUS XG34WCDMTG0.002score per dollar
vs
Acer Predator X32 Xbmiipphuzx 32" Black 20260.005score per dollar
Acer Predator X32 Xbmiipphuzx 32" Black 2026 offers 2.5x better value for money
ASUS XG34WCDMTG
Acer Predator X32 Xbmiipphuzx 32" Black 2026
Verdict
Winner: Acer Predator X32 Xbmiipphuzx 32"
Scores 84 overall, wins 4 of 6 usage categories and 6 of 29 specs.
