ASUS VG248QG 24" ブラック 2019
ASUS
64 Overall Score
vs
MSI MAG 275UPD E14 27" Metallic Black 2025
MSI
81 Overall Score
Scores
Office
Gaming
Professional
Creative
Entertainment
Portable
Specifications
| ASUS VG248QG 24" | MSI MAG 275UPD E14 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 24" | 27" |
| Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 3840 x 2160 |
| Panel Type | TN | IPS★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 165 Hz | 288 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 0.5 ms★ | 1 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | G-Sync Compatible★ | FreeSync |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 350 nits★ | 250 nits |
| Color Gamut | 16.7 Million | 130% sRGB, 90% DCI-P3 |
| Color Depth | — | 10-bit★ |
| HDR | — | DisplayHDR 400 |
| HDR Support | — | HDR400 |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 1 | 2★ |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | 0 | 0 |
| Speakers | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pivot | ✓ | ✓ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | — | ✓★ |
| Power | 65W★ | — |
| Weight | 5.22 kg★ | 6.08 kg |
Pros & Cons
ASUS VG248QG 24" ブラック 2019
- Strong performance (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (75th percentile)
- Below average display (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average feature (23rd percentile)
MSI MAG 275UPD E14 27" Metallic Black 2025
- Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong performance (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong display (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong feature (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Below average portability (15th percentile)15th %ile
Pricing
ASUS VG248QG 24" ブラック 20190.020score per dollar
vs
MSI MAG 275UPD E14 27" Metallic Black 20250.010score per dollar
ASUS VG248QG 24" ブラック 2019 offers 2.0x better value for money
ASUS VG248QG 24" ブラック 2019
MSI MAG 275UPD E14 27" Metallic Black 2025
Verdict
Winner: MSI MAG 275UPD E14 27"
Scores 81 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 5 of 28 specs.
