ASUS ROG Strix XG27UCSR 27" Black
ASUS
84 Overall Score
vs
Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 2025
Samsung
92 Overall Score
Scores
Office
Creative
Gaming
Professional
Entertainment
Portable
Specifications
| ASUS ROG Strix XG27UCSR 27" | Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 27" | 27" |
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | IPS | QD-OLED★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 160 Hz | 500 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 1 ms | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ |
| Adaptive Sync | G-Sync Compatible★ | FreeSync Premium Pro |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 350 nits★ | 300 nits |
| Color Gamut | 95% DCI-P3, 130% sRGB | 99% (CIE1976) |
| Color Depth | 10-bit | 10-bit |
| HDR | DisplayHDR 400 | HDR10+ |
| HDR Support | HDR10 | HDR10+ |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 1 | 2★ |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | 1 | 3★ |
| Speakers | ✗ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pivot | ✓ | ✓ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | — | ✗ |
| Power | 25W★ | 140W |
| Weight | 5.99 kg★ | 6.90 kg |
Pros & Cons
ASUS ROG Strix XG27UCSR 27" Black
- Strong color (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong user sentiment (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong display (88th percentile)88th %ile
Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 2025
- Strong performance (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
Pricing
ASUS ROG Strix XG27UCSR 27" Black0.010score per dollar
vs
Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 20250.007score per dollar
ASUS ROG Strix XG27UCSR 27" Black offers 1.4x better value for money
ASUS ROG Strix XG27UCSR 27" Black
Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 2025
Verdict
Winner: Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27"
Scores 92 overall, wins 4 of 6 usage categories and 5 of 28 specs.
