Samsung 390 Series C24F390 24" Black 2016
Samsung
55 Overall Score
vs
BenQ MA270U 27" Sliver 2024
BenQ
87 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Creative
Office
Entertainment
Gaming
Portable
Specifications
| Samsung 390 Series C24F390 24" | BenQ MA270U 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 24" | 27" |
| Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 3840 x 2160 |
| Panel Type | VA | IPS★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✓ | ✗ |
| Curvature | 1,800 | — |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Response Time | 4 ms★ | 5 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync★ | — |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 250 nits | 400 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 72% NTSC | 99% sRGB, 95% P3 |
| Color Depth | 8-bit | 10-bit★ |
| HDR | HDR Support":"No | HDR10 |
| HDR Support | HDR10 | HDR10 |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 1 | 2★ |
| DisplayPort | 0★ | — |
| USB-C | 0 | 2★ |
| Thunderbolt | — | N/A |
| Speakers | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Pivot | ✗ | ✓★ |
| VESA Mount | 75x75 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | ✗ |
| Power | 25W★ | 90W |
| Weight | 3.31 kg★ | 8.20 kg |
Pros & Cons
Samsung 390 Series C24F390 24" Black 2016
- Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong feature (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Below average display (33rd percentile)
BenQ MA270U 27" Sliver 2024
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong color (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong ergonomic (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Below average performance (22nd percentile)
Pricing
Samsung 390 Series C24F390 24" Black 20160.012score per dollar
vs
BenQ MA270U 27" Sliver 20240.006score per dollar
Samsung 390 Series C24F390 24" Black 2016 offers 2.0x better value for money
Samsung 390 Series C24F390 24" Black 2016
BenQ MA270U 27" Sliver 2024
Verdict
Winner: BenQ MA270U 27"
Scores 87 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 30 specs.
