ASUS ROG Strix XG32UCWMG 31.5"
ASUS
84 Overall Score
vs
Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 2025
Samsung
92 Overall Score
Scores
Gaming
Office
Creative
Professional
Entertainment
Portable
Specifications
| ASUS ROG Strix XG32UCWMG 31.5" | Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 31.5" | 27" |
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | OLED | QD-OLED |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 480 Hz | 500 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 0.029999999329447746 ms | 0.029999999329447746 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | G-Sync★ | FreeSync Premium Pro |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 1300 nits★ | 300 nits |
| Color Gamut | 99% DCI-P3 | 99% (CIE1976) |
| Color Depth | 10-Bit | 10-bit |
| HDR | HDR10 | HDR10+ |
| HDR Support | HDR10 | HDR10+ |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | 1 | 3★ |
| Speakers | ✗ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pivot | ✗ | ✓★ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | — | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | ✗ |
| Power | 44W★ | 140W |
| Weight | 7.30 kg | 6.90 kg★ |
Pros & Cons
ASUS ROG Strix XG32UCWMG 31.5"
- Strong performance (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong color (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong display (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 2025
- Strong performance (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
Pricing
ASUS ROG Strix XG32UCWMG 31.5"0.004score per dollar
vs
Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 20250.007score per dollar
Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 2025 offers 1.8x better value for money
ASUS ROG Strix XG32UCWMG 31.5"
Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 2025
Verdict
Winner: Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27"
Scores 92 overall, wins 1 of 6 usage categories and 4 of 28 specs.
