Aten Technology CL3800 18.5" White
Aten Technology
19 Overall Score
vs
MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 2026
MSI
95 Overall Score
Scores
Office
Professional
Gaming
Creative
Entertainment
Portable
Specifications
| Aten Technology CL3800 18.5" | MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 18.5" | 27" |
| Resolution | 1920 x 1200 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | — | QD-OLED★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 240 Hz★ |
| Response Time | — | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ |
| Adaptive Sync | — | FreeSync Premium Pro★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 300 nits | 1000 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | — | 99% DCI-P3 |
| Color Depth | — | 10-bit★ |
| HDR | — | DisplayHDR True Black 400 |
| HDR Support | — | HDR |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort | — | 1★ |
| USB-C | — | 1★ |
| Speakers | — | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | — | ✓★ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | — | ✓★ |
| Tilt | — | ✓★ |
| Swivel | — | ✓★ |
| Pivot | — | ✓★ |
| VESA Mount | — | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | — | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | — | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 14.51 kg | 8.00 kg★ |
Pros & Cons
Aten Technology CL3800 18.5" White
- Below average social proof (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average ergonomic (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average performance (22nd percentile)
- Below average feature (23rd percentile)
MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 2026
- Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong color (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
Pricing
Aten Technology CL3800 18.5" White0.001score per dollar
vs
MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 20260.008score per dollar
MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 2026 offers 8.0x better value for money
Aten Technology CL3800 18.5" White
MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 2026
Verdict
Winner: MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27"
Scores 95 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 15 of 27 specs.
