ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5" Black 2024
ASUS
96 Overall Score
vs
ChzsyhC C240E1 24" Black
ChzsyhC
39 Overall Score
Scores
Office
Professional
Gaming
Creative
Entertainment
Portable
Specifications
| ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5" | ChzsyhC C240E1 24" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 26.5" | 24" |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 1920 x 1080 |
| Panel Type | OLED★ | — |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✓ |
| Curvature | — | 1,800 |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz★ | 180 Hz |
| Response Time | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ | 1 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium Pro★ | FreeSync |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 450 nits★ | — |
| Color Gamut | 99% DCI-P3, 135% sRGB | — |
| Color Depth | 10-bit★ | — |
| HDR | HDR10 | — |
| HDR Support | HDR10★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2★ | — |
| DisplayPort | 1★ | — |
| USB-C | 2★ | — |
| Speakers | ✗ | — |
| Headphone Jack | ✓★ | — |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓★ | — |
| Tilt | ✓★ | — |
| Swivel | ✓★ | — |
| Pivot | ✓★ | — |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 75x75 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | — |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | — |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | — |
| Power | 25W★ | — |
| Weight | 6.70 kg | 3.62 kg★ |
Pros & Cons
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5" Black 2024
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong color (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong connectivity (95th percentile)95th %ile
ChzsyhC C240E1 24" Black
- Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong performance (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average connectivity (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average color (21st percentile)
- Below average display (33rd percentile)
- Below average portability (33rd percentile)
Pricing
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5" Black 20240.007score per dollar
vs
ChzsyhC C240E1 24" Black0.019score per dollar
ChzsyhC C240E1 24" Black offers 2.7x better value for money
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5" Black 2024
ChzsyhC C240E1 24" Black
Verdict
Winner: ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5"
Scores 96 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 16 of 29 specs.
