Viltrox AF 16/1.8 L 16mm

Viltrox AF 16/1.8 L 16mm

Viltrox
64 Overall Score
vs
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Sony
89 Overall Score

Scores

Video Cinema
Viltrox
78
Sony
94
Street
Viltrox
71
Sony
92
Portrait
Viltrox
88
Sony
84
Budget
Viltrox
62
Sony
86
Professional
Viltrox
76
Sony
86
Travel
Viltrox
38
Sony
85
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
59
Sony
79
Landscape
Viltrox
52
Sony
69
Macro
Viltrox
53
Sony
64

Specifications

Viltrox AF 16/1.8 L 16mmSony E SELP1650 16-50mm
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min16 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max16 mm50 mm
Elements159
Groups128
Aspherical Elements34
ED Elements41
Aperture
Max Aperturef/1.8f/3.5
Min Aperture1.83.5-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades97
Build
MountLeica LSony E
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weight0.55 kg0.12 kg
Filter Thread77 mm41 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTMStepping motor
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance270 mm249 mm
Max Magnification0.1X0.215x

Pros & Cons

Viltrox AF 16/1.8 L 16mm

  • Strong bokeh (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong aperture (93th percentile)93th %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average macro (24th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

  • Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92th percentile)92th %ile
  • Strong af (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Below average macro (35th percentile)

Pricing

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm is MX$5,276 cheaper (2.6x less).

Viltrox AF 16/1.8 L 16mm0.007score per dollar
vs
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm0.027score per dollar

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm offers 3.9x better value for money

Viltrox AF 16/1.8 L 16mm

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Verdict

Winner: Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Scores 89 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 20 specs.

Viltrox AF 16/1.8 L 16mm Better at:

Portrait

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider