Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron
100 Overall Score
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-S35 35mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-S35 35mm

Panasonic
62 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

92 out of 100 medium confidence 13 reviews

The Tamron 28-300mm super-zoom wins praise for its lightweight design, versatile focal range, and solid image quality. Users appreciate the compact build and smooth zoom mechanism, but note the slow aperture and trade-offs in sharpness compared to more expensive zooms. Verified reviewers find it an ideal travel lens that pairs well with Sony bodies.

Pros
  • Lightweight design
  • Versatile 28-300mm focal range
  • Smooth zoom ring operation
  • Compact build for travel
  • Good integration with Sony bodies
Cons
  • Small maximum aperture (f/4-7.1)
  • Reduced sharpness vs. premium zooms
  • Not an internal zoom lens
  • Slow autofocus at high fps on some bodies
👍 Build quality 3
🤔 Sharpness 3
👎 Aperture 2
👍 Weight and portability 3
👍 Zoom range 4
👎 Autofocus performance 1

Panasonic LUMIX S S-S35 35mm

85 out of 100 medium confidence 12 reviews

This 35mm f/1.8 lens is widely praised for its sharpness, fast and quiet autofocus, and lightweight build, making it a versatile choice for both photo and video work. Users highlight its excellent value, especially when bundled with Lumix bodies, and its ability to produce clean images in low light. However, one verified review warns of extreme distortion when used with the Ronin 4D gimbal, which may be a dealbreaker for videographers relying on straight lines.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Fast and quiet autofocus
  • Lightweight and compact build
  • Excellent value for money
  • Great low-light performance
Cons
  • Extreme distortion with Ronin 4D
  • Requires lens profile for raw correction
👍 Image quality 8
👍 Autofocus performance 6
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Value for money 5
👍 Low light performance 3
👎 Distortion issues 1

Scores

Budget
Tamron
95
Panasonic
54
Macro
Tamron
91
Panasonic
70
Landscape
Tamron
90
Panasonic
59
Portrait
Tamron
85
Panasonic
44
Professional
Tamron
85
Panasonic
62
Wildlife Sports
Tamron
85
Panasonic
49
Video Cinema
Tamron
82
Panasonic
58
Street
Tamron
81
Panasonic
59
Travel
Tamron
81
Panasonic
59

Specifications

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXDPanasonic LUMIX S S-S35 35mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min28 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm35 mm
Elements2011
Groups139
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements23★
Coatingfluorine coatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/22
Min Aperture4-7.1f/1.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountSony EL-Mount
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.59 kg0.29 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeVXD linear motor★Autofocus
Stabilization✓★✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★240 mm
Max Magnification1:2.81:4.55

Pros & Cons

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile

Panasonic LUMIX S S-S35 35mm

  • Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong build (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong optical (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong macro (78th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD is MX$3,366 cheaper (1.2x less).

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD0.007score per dollar
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-S35 35mm0.003score per dollar

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD offers 2.3x better value for money

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Panasonic LUMIX S S-S35 35mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Scores 100 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider