Canon HL-C 60mm

Canon HL-C 60mm

Canon
42 Overall Score
vs
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Sony
89 Overall Score

Scores

Video Cinema
Canon
53
Sony
94
Street
Canon
51
Sony
92
Budget
Canon
43
Sony
86
Professional
Canon
46
Sony
86
Travel
Canon
45
Sony
85
Portrait
Canon
52
Sony
84
Wildlife Sports
Canon
39
Sony
79
Landscape
Canon
31
Sony
69
Macro
Canon
25
Sony
64

Specifications

Canon HL-C 60mmSony E SELP1650 16-50mm
Optics
Typestandardzoom
Focal Length Min60 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max60 mm50 mm
Elements9
Groups8
Aspherical Elements4
ED Elements1
Aperture
Max Aperturef/8f/3.5
Min Aperture83.5-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades7
Build
MountCanon F-mountSony E
FormatAPS-C
Weight0.03 kg0.12 kg
Filter Thread41 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyStepping motor
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance249 mm
Max Magnification0.215x

Pros & Cons

Canon HL-C 60mm

  • Strong build (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (81th percentile)81th %ile
  • Below average macro (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average af (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average optical (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

  • Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92th percentile)92th %ile
  • Strong af (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Below average macro (35th percentile)

Pricing

Canon HL-C 60mm is MX$2,611 cheaper (4.5x less).

Canon HL-C 60mm0.057score per dollar
vs
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm0.027score per dollar

Canon HL-C 60mm offers 2.1x better value for money

Canon HL-C 60mm

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Verdict

Winner: Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 20 specs.

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider