Sigma 485101
Sigma
44 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 200-27mm
Fujifilm
80 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Macro
Video Cinema
Street
Wildlife Sports
Budget
Landscape
Portrait
Travel
Specifications
| Sigma 485101 | Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 200-27mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | fisheye | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 8 mm | 18 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 8 mm | 18 mm |
| Elements | 11 | 15 |
| Groups | 6 | 9 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | 1 | 1 |
| Coating | Super Multi-Layer Coating | Super EBC coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/16 |
| Min Aperture | f/3.5 | f/1.4 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 6 | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon F | Fujifilm X |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.40 kg | 0.37 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 62 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus (with Nikon Cameras That Have an Autofocus Motor) | Linear motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 135 mm★ | 200 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:4.6 | 1:6.67 |
Pros & Cons
Sigma 485101
- Strong macro (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong social proof (68th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average aperture (23rd percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 200-27mm
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong social proof (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong macro (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Pricing
Sigma 4851010.003score per dollar
vs
Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 200-27mm0.005score per dollar
Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 200-27mm offers 1.7x better value for money
Sigma 485101
Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 200-27mm
Verdict
Winner: Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 200-27mm
Scores 80 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.
