Zeiss Biogon T ZM 1486-394-L 35mm

Zeiss Biogon T ZM 1486-394-L 35mm

Zeiss
58 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron
100 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Zeiss Biogon T ZM 1486-394-L 35mm

88 out of 100 low confidence 6 reviews

This Zeiss 35mm lens is highly praised for its sharpness and build quality, often compared favorably to Leica alternatives at a much lower price. Users appreciate its compact size and smooth operation, though the focusing tab is noted as slightly less intuitive than Leica's. It serves well as a versatile everyday lens, with one reviewer using it daily for all but portraits.

Pros
  • Exceptional sharpness
  • Great value for money
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Solid build quality
  • Smooth focusing and aperture
Cons
  • Focusing tab less intuitive than Leica
  • Not ideal for portraits
👍 Sharpness 2
👍 Value for money 2
👍 Build quality 3
👍 Compactness 2
👎 Focusing tab usability 1
👎 Portrait suitability 1

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

92 out of 100 medium confidence 13 reviews

The Tamron 28-300mm super-zoom wins praise for its lightweight design, versatile focal range, and solid image quality. Users appreciate the compact build and smooth zoom mechanism, but note the slow aperture and trade-offs in sharpness compared to more expensive zooms. Verified reviewers find it an ideal travel lens that pairs well with Sony bodies.

Pros
  • Lightweight design
  • Versatile 28-300mm focal range
  • Smooth zoom ring operation
  • Compact build for travel
  • Good integration with Sony bodies
Cons
  • Small maximum aperture (f/4-7.1)
  • Reduced sharpness vs. premium zooms
  • Not an internal zoom lens
  • Slow autofocus at high fps on some bodies
👍 Build quality 3
🤔 Sharpness 3
👎 Aperture 2
👍 Weight and portability 3
👍 Zoom range 4
👎 Autofocus performance 1

Scores

Budget
Zeiss
51
Tamron
97
Macro
Zeiss
38
Tamron
92
Landscape
Zeiss
47
Tamron
87
Wildlife Sports
Zeiss
41
Tamron
85
Professional
Zeiss
53
Tamron
85
Street
Zeiss
65
Tamron
83
Portrait
Zeiss
67
Tamron
82
Video Cinema
Zeiss
48
Tamron
82
Travel
Zeiss
51
Tamron
81

Specifications

Zeiss Biogon T ZM 1486-394-L 35mmTamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD
Optics
Typewide-anglezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm300 mm
Elements920
Groups613
Aspherical Elements—3★
ED Elements—2★
CoatingT-Antireflexbeschichtungfluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/4
Min Aperturef/2.84-7.1
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades10★9
Build
MountLeica MSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.20 kg★0.59 kg
Filter Thread43 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyVXD linear motor★
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance700 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification0.05347222221:3.8★

Pros & Cons

Zeiss Biogon T ZM 1486-394-L 35mm

  • Strong build (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average macro (29th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile

Pricing

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD is MX$3,347 cheaper (1.2x less).

Zeiss Biogon T ZM 1486-394-L 35mm0.003score per dollar
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD0.007score per dollar

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD offers 2.3x better value for money

Zeiss Biogon T ZM 1486-394-L 35mm

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Scores 100 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider