Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Nikon
67 Overall Score
vs
Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon
86 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

88 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

Users are overwhelmingly positive about this ultra-wide zoom lens, praising its sharpness, minimal distortion, and fast autofocus. It pairs well with various Nikon bodies, including the D850, D780, D6, and Z9, and is particularly favored for landscape and real estate photography. The moderate price and lightweight design are also appreciated, though some note it's not an f/2.8 lens. Overall, it's highly recommended for those seeking a wide-angle option.

Pros
  • Sharp and crisp images
  • Minimal distortion
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
  • Lightweight design
  • Moderate price
Cons
  • Not f/2.8 aperture
  • Limited use so far
👍 Image quality 6
👍 Distortion 3
👍 Autofocus performance 2
👍 Build quality 2
👍 Value for money 2
👍 Compatibility 4

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

78 out of 100 high confidence 98 reviews

The Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM lens is widely praised as a versatile all-in-one walk-around lens for APS-C cameras. Users consistently highlight its silent and smooth STM autofocus, effective image stabilization, and useful zoom range that covers wide-angle to short telephoto. While image quality is considered very good for a kit-level zoom, some reviewers note softness at extreme focal lengths, barrel distortion at 18mm, and a variable aperture that limits low-light performance. Build quality is described as mostly plastic but adequate, though the focus-by-wire manual ring and occasional stiff zoom ring draw criticism.

Pros
  • Silent and smooth STM autofocus
  • Effective image stabilization
  • Versatile 18-135mm zoom range
  • Good image quality for a kit lens
  • Lightweight and compact design
Cons
  • Softness at extreme focal lengths
  • Barrel distortion at 18mm
  • Variable aperture limits low-light use
  • Focus-by-wire manual ring
  • Plastic build feels cheap
👍 Autofocus performance 25
👍 Image quality 30
👍 Image stabilization 12
🤔 Build quality 15
👍 Zoom range versatility 22
👎 Low light performance 10

Scores

Portrait
Nikon
45
Canon
95
Budget
Nikon
60
Canon
92
Video Cinema
Nikon
56
Canon
87
Street
Nikon
49
Canon
79
Travel
Nikon
51
Canon
79
Landscape
Nikon
67
Canon
75
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
46
Canon
71
Professional
Nikon
55
Canon
70
Macro
Nikon
70
Canon
68

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VRCanon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm135 mm
Elements1716
Groups1212
Aspherical Elements3★1
ED Elements2★1
CoatingNano Crystal CoatSuper Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/3.5
Min Aperturef/43.5-5.6
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades9★7
Build
MountNikon FCanon EF-S
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✗✗
Weight0.68 kg0.52 kg★
Filter Thread77 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSilent Wave MotorSTM★
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops2.5 stops4 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance290 mm★390 mm
Max Magnification1:4★0.28x

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (77th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (75th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (25th percentile)

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong aperture (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (32nd percentile)

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Scores 86 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 22 specs.

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider