Canon 75-300mm

Canon 75-300mm

Canon
40 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
98 Overall Score

Scores

Landscape
Canon
29
Sigma
100
Budget
Canon
52
Sigma
99
Macro
Canon
16
Sigma
96
Travel
Canon
38
Sigma
93
Video Cinema
Canon
37
Sigma
90
Wildlife Sports
Canon
35
Sigma
87
Portrait
Canon
49
Sigma
85
Professional
Canon
32
Sigma
84
Street
Canon
45
Sigma
80

Specifications

Canon 75-300mmSigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Optics
Type—zoom
Focal Length Min75 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm300 mm
Elements—20
Groups—14
Aspherical Elements—4★
ED Elements—5★
Coating—water- and oil-repellent coating
Aperture
Max Aperture—f/3.5
Min Aperture3.5-5.63.5-6.7
Constant—✗
Diaphragm Blades—9★
Build
Mount—Sony E
Format—APS-C★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.50 kg★0.61 kg
Filter Thread—67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Type—HLA
Stabilization—✓★
Stabilization Stops—6 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance—170 mm★
Max Magnification—1:2★

Pros & Cons

Canon 75-300mm

  • Strong versatility (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong aperture (66th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong macro (88th percentile)88th %ile

Pricing

Canon 75-300mm

No current pricing available

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Verdict

★ Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Scores 98 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 22 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider