Meike MIX Series 85mm F1.4 85mm

Meike MIX Series 85mm F1.4 85mm

Meike
64 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

Tamron
97 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Meike MIX Series 85mm F1.4 85mm

88 out of 100 medium confidence 22 reviews

The Meike 55mm f/1.4 AF lens for APS-C Nikon Z cameras is a compact, fast-aperture portrait lens that delivers excellent sharpness and creamy bokeh at a very affordable price. Autofocus is quick and reliable, with good eye detection, and the lens handles well on smaller bodies like the Z30. Some users noted the minimum focus distance is a bit limiting and the build feels plasticky, but overall it offers outstanding value for money.

Pros
  • Excellent sharpness
  • Creamy bokeh
  • Fast and reliable autofocus
  • Great value for money
  • Compact and lightweight
Cons
  • Plasticky build feel
  • Limited minimum focus distance
  • No image stabilization
  • Some chromatic aberration wide open
  • Vignetting at wide apertures
👍 Sharpness 12
👍 Bokeh 10
👍 Autofocus performance 14
👍 Value for money 15
🤔 Build quality 8
👎 Minimum focus distance 4

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

85 out of 100 high confidence 62 reviews

The Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD lens is widely praised for its sharpness, versatile zoom range, constant aperture, and effective stabilization, making it an excellent all-around lens for APS-C cameras. Users appreciate its solid build quality and value for money, though many note it is noticeably heavier and larger than typical kit lenses, which can feel unbalanced on smaller camera bodies. A few reviewers mention minor issues like chromatic aberration at the longer end and noise from the aperture blades at certain settings, but overall sentiment is very positive.

Pros
  • sharp image quality across zoom range
  • constant f/2.8 aperture
  • effective image stabilization
  • fast and quiet autofocus
  • versatile 17-70mm focal range
Cons
  • heavy and large for APS-C body
  • chromatic aberration at 50-70mm
  • aperture blade noise above f/5.6
  • short zoom throw initially stiff
  • no aperture ring on Fuji version
👍 Image quality 27
👍 Build quality 15
🤔 Weight and size 18
👍 Value for money 14
👍 Stabilization 12
👍 Autofocus performance 11

Scores

Video Cinema
Meike
57
Tamron
98
Budget
Meike
58
Tamron
96
Macro
Meike
57
Tamron
91
Professional
Meike
51
Tamron
91
Portrait
Meike
64
Tamron
90
Travel
Meike
38
Tamron
87
Landscape
Meike
46
Tamron
84
Street
Meike
56
Tamron
78
Wildlife Sports
Meike
58
Tamron
75

Specifications

Meike MIX Series 85mm F1.4 85mmTamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min85 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max85 mm70 mm
Elements1316
Groups812
Aspherical Elements—3★
ED Elements4★2
CoatingMultilayer CoatingFluorine Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/2.8
Min Aperturef/1.4f/2.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades12★9
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.73 kg0.54 kg★
Filter Thread77 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★RXD
Stabilization✓✓
Focus
Min Focus Distance980 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification—1:4.8★

Pros & Cons

Meike MIX Series 85mm F1.4 85mm

  • Strong af (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong optical (75th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

  • Strong optical (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong versatility (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile

Pricing

Meike MIX Series 85mm F1.4 85mm is MX$7,267 cheaper (2.0x less).

Meike MIX Series 85mm F1.4 85mm

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

Scores 97 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider