Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

Sigma
96 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di-II AF018C-700 18-250mm

Tamron Di-II AF018C-700 18-250mm

Tamron
54 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

95 out of 100 high confidence 36 reviews

The Sigma 17-40mm f/1.8 DC DN Art lens is overwhelmingly praised for its exceptional image quality, fast constant aperture, and compact internal zoom design. Users highlight its sharpness, lightweight build, and excellent autofocus performance, especially on crop-sensor mirrorless cameras like the Canon R7 and Fujifilm bodies. A few questions about compatibility with specific cameras and features like weather sealing and aperture ring are noted, but the overall sentiment is extremely positive.

Pros
  • Exceptional image quality
  • Fast constant f/1.8 aperture
  • Compact internal zoom design
  • Lightweight build
  • Sharp and bright photos
Cons
  • No weather sealing mentioned
  • No manual aperture ring on some mounts
  • Compatibility questions with full-frame cameras
  • Expensive for some buyers
👍 Image quality 8
👍 Aperture 7
👍 Build quality 6
👍 Autofocus 4
👍 Value for money 4
🤔 Compatibility 12

Tamron Di-II AF018C-700 18-250mm

82 out of 100 low confidence 5 reviews

The Tamron 18-250mm lens is praised as an excellent all-in-one travel lens offering outstanding sharpness and color for its range, especially when stopped down. Users highlight its lightweight design, near-macro capability, and good value compared to Canon alternatives. However, the lack of image stabilization is a notable drawback, causing blur in low-light or handheld telephoto shots, and some report zoom creep. Overall, it is recommended for amateurs who understand its limitations.

Pros
  • Outstanding sharpness when stopped down
  • Excellent all-in-one travel lens
  • Lightweight and compact design
  • Near-macro focusing capability
  • Good value for money
Cons
  • No image stabilization
  • Zoom creep issue
  • Vignetting visible in some shots
  • Chromatic aberration/fringing
  • Softness in corners at wide apertures
👍 Image quality 5
👎 Image stabilization 4
👍 Value for money 4
🤔 Build quality 3
👎 Zoom creep 2
👍 Autofocus performance 2

Scores

Portrait
Sigma
93
Tamron
38
Video Cinema
Sigma
89
Tamron
43
Professional
Sigma
89
Tamron
40
Budget
Sigma
87
Tamron
57
Macro
Sigma
82
Tamron
58
Travel
Sigma
81
Tamron
56
Street
Sigma
79
Tamron
45
Landscape
Sigma
79
Tamron
53
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
68
Tamron
44

Specifications

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DCTamron Di-II AF018C-700 18-250mm
Optics
Typezoommacro
Focal Length Min17 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max40 mm250 mm
Elements17—
Groups11—
Aspherical Elements4★1
ED Elements4★1
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coatingadvanced multi-coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/1.8f/18
Min Aperturef/1.83.5-6.3
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades11★—
Build
MountFujifilm XCanon AF
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.54 kg0.42 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeHLA (High-response Linear Actuator)—
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm★450 mm
Max Magnification1:4.81:3.5

Pros & Cons

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong aperture (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Below average stabilization (34th percentile)

Tamron Di-II AF018C-700 18-250mm

  • Strong versatility (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (79th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (21st percentile)

Pricing

Tamron Di-II AF018C-700 18-250mm is MX$11,679 cheaper (2.2x less).

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC0.004score per dollar
vs
Tamron Di-II AF018C-700 18-250mm0.006score per dollar

Tamron Di-II AF018C-700 18-250mm offers 1.5x better value for money

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

Tamron Di-II AF018C-700 18-250mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

Scores 96 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider