Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

Sigma
96 Overall Score
vs
Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm

Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm

Zeiss
71 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

95 out of 100 high confidence 36 reviews

The Sigma 17-40mm f/1.8 DC DN Art lens is overwhelmingly praised for its exceptional image quality, fast constant aperture, and compact internal zoom design. Users highlight its sharpness, lightweight build, and excellent autofocus performance, especially on crop-sensor mirrorless cameras like the Canon R7 and Fujifilm bodies. A few questions about compatibility with specific cameras and features like weather sealing and aperture ring are noted, but the overall sentiment is extremely positive.

Pros
  • Exceptional image quality
  • Fast constant f/1.8 aperture
  • Compact internal zoom design
  • Lightweight build
  • Sharp and bright photos
Cons
  • No weather sealing mentioned
  • No manual aperture ring on some mounts
  • Compatibility questions with full-frame cameras
  • Expensive for some buyers
👍 Image quality 8
👍 Aperture 7
👍 Build quality 6
👍 Autofocus 4
👍 Value for money 4
🤔 Compatibility 12

Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm

85 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

The Zeiss Batis lenses receive overwhelmingly positive feedback for their exceptional image quality, beautiful bokeh, and solid build. Users praise the sharpness, color rendering, and fast autofocus, though one reviewer noted a defective unit with packaging issues. Overall, these lenses are highly recommended for portrait and outdoor photography, with minor caveats about weight and price.

Pros
  • Exceptional image sharpness
  • Beautiful bokeh rendering
  • Fast and quiet autofocus
  • Solid build quality
  • Excellent color reproduction
Cons
  • High price point
  • Heavy weight
  • Requires distance for portraits
  • Defective unit reported
  • Poor packaging in some cases
👍 Image quality 7
👍 Bokeh 5
👍 Autofocus 5
👍 Build quality 6
🤔 Price 4
👎 Weight 3

Scores

Portrait
Sigma
93
Zeiss
82
Video Cinema
Sigma
89
Zeiss
76
Professional
Sigma
89
Zeiss
76
Budget
Sigma
87
Zeiss
66
Macro
Sigma
82
Zeiss
48
Travel
Sigma
81
Zeiss
53
Street
Sigma
79
Zeiss
68
Landscape
Sigma
79
Zeiss
59
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
68
Zeiss
62

Specifications

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DCZeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm
Optics
Typezoomtelephoto
Focal Length Min17 mm135 mm
Focal Length Max40 mm135 mm
Elements1714
Groups1111
Aspherical Elements4★—
ED Elements4★—
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingZEISS T* coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/1.8f/2.8
Min Aperturef/1.8f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades11★—
Build
MountFujifilm XSony E
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.54 kg★0.61 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeHLA (High-response Linear Actuator)Autofocus
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm★—
Max Magnification1:4.8★—

Pros & Cons

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong aperture (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Below average stabilization (34th percentile)

Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm

  • Strong aperture (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (79th percentile)
  • Below average macro (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Pricing

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC is MX$14,827 cheaper (1.7x less).

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC0.005score per dollar
vs
Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm0.002score per dollar

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC offers 2.5x better value for money

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

Scores 96 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider