Canon EF-S 9517A002 17-85mm

Canon EF-S 9517A002 17-85mm

Canon
78 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon
90 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Canon
86
Nikon
98
Wildlife Sports
Canon
69
Nikon
94
Travel
Canon
68
Nikon
92
Landscape
Canon
67
Nikon
88
Professional
Canon
67
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Canon
73
Nikon
82
Street
Canon
78
Nikon
81
Macro
Canon
78
Nikon
74
Portrait
Canon
72
Nikon
78

Specifications

Canon EF-S 9517A002 17-85mmNikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm24 mm
Focal Length Max85 mm200 mm
Elements1719
Groups1215
Aspherical Elements12★
ED Elements—1★
CoatingFluorine coatingARNEO and Nano Crystal Coatings
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/4
Min Aperture4-5.64-6.3
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades—7★
Build
MountCanon EF-SNikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✗✓★
Weight0.48 kg★0.57 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeUSM★stepping motor
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops3 stops5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance350 mm★500 mm
Max Magnification1:2★0.28x

Pros & Cons

Canon EF-S 9517A002 17-85mm

  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong versatility (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong optical (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile

Pricing

Canon EF-S 9517A002 17-85mm

No current pricing available

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Scores 90 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Canon EF-S 9517A002 17-85mm Better at:

Macro

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider