Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
44 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR 2190 85mm

Nikon NIKKOR 2190 85mm

Nikon
60 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Sigma
16
Nikon
65
Portrait
Sigma
59
Nikon
30
Budget
Sigma
56
Nikon
46
Landscape
Sigma
33
Nikon
49
Video Cinema
Sigma
47
Nikon
42
Street
Sigma
46
Nikon
43
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
39
Nikon
45
Travel
Sigma
40
Nikon
44
Professional
Sigma
42
Nikon
43

Specifications

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OSNikon NIKKOR 2190 85mm
Optics
Typemacro
Focal Length Min16 mm85 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm85 mm
Elements14
Groups10
Aspherical Elements0
ED Elements1
CoatingSuper Integrated Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/32
Min Aperturef/3.5
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountNikon F
FormatAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.35 kg
Filter Thread52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSilent Wave Motor
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops3 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance286 mm
Max Magnification1:1

Pros & Cons

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR 2190 85mm

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong macro (74th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR 2190 85mm

Scores 60 overall, wins 4 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 22 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Better at:

BudgetStreetPortraitVideo Cinema

Nikon NIKKOR 2190 85mm Better at:

MacroTravelLandscapeWildlife Sports