Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
OM System M.Zuiko 40-150mm f/4-5.6 R
OM System
56 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Macro
Budget
Street
Portrait
Video Cinema
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Specifications
| Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | OM System M.Zuiko 40-150mm f/4-5.6 R | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 17 mm | 40 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 28 mm | 150 mm |
| Elements | 13 | 13 |
| Groups | 11 | 10 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3★ | — |
| ED Elements | 3★ | 1 |
| Coating | Multi-Coated | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | 4-5.6 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon Z | Micro Four Thirds |
| Format | full-frame★ | micro-four-thirds |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Weight | 0.45 kg | 0.19 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 58 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Stepping Motor★ | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 190 mm★ | 900 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.26★ | 0.16x |
Pros & Cons
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
OM System M.Zuiko 40-150mm f/4-5.6 R
- Strong build (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong versatility (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong social proof (78th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average macro (31st percentile)
Pricing
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.004score per dollar
vs
OM System M.Zuiko 40-150mm f/4-5.6 R0.017score per dollar
OM System M.Zuiko 40-150mm f/4-5.6 R offers 4.3x better value for money
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
OM System M.Zuiko 40-150mm f/4-5.6 R
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 91 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.
