Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
95 Overall Score
vs
Canon L RF 135mm f/1.8 L IS USM 135mm
Canon
65 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Portrait
Street
Budget
Macro
Landscape
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Specifications
| Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | Canon L RF 135mm f/1.8 L IS USM 135mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 17 mm | 135 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 28 mm | 135 mm |
| Elements | 13 | 17 |
| Groups | 11 | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3★ | — |
| ED Elements | 3 | 3 |
| Coating | Multi-Coated | Air Sphere Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/1.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon Z | Canon RF |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.45 kg★ | 0.94 kg |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 82 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Stepping Motor | Nano USM★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 5.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 190 mm★ | 700 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.26★ | 0.26x |
Pros & Cons
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
Canon L RF 135mm f/1.8 L IS USM 135mm
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong optical (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average bokeh (24th percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
- Below average macro (34th percentile)
Pricing
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Canon L RF 135mm f/1.8 L IS USM 135mm
No current pricing available
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.
