Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Art 105mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Macro 105mm

Sigma Art 105mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Macro 105mm

Sigma
80 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

92 out of 100 medium confidence 11 reviews

The Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 lens is highly praised for its sharpness, compact size, and excellent low-light performance. Users love its versatility for travel, video, and long exposures, often pairing it with other lenses in the budget trinity. A few note it's not as premium as the S-line or Nikon 14-30mm, but most agree it offers incredible value for the price.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Excellent low-light performance
  • Great value for money
  • Versatile for travel and video
Cons
  • Not as premium as S-line lenses
  • Some prefer wider 14-30mm range
  • Build not as exceptional as premium trinity
👍 Image quality 8
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Value for money 6
👍 Low light performance 4
👍 Size and weight 5
👍 Versatility 5

Sigma Art 105mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Macro 105mm

78 out of 100 high confidence 40 reviews

The Sigma 105mm f/2.8 Macro Art lens is widely praised for its exceptional sharpness, beautiful bokeh, and versatile macro-to-portrait performance. Many users highlight its solid build and value, though some note slow autofocus, noisy HSM motor, and occasional focusing issues in macro or low-contrast situations. A few mention compatibility quirks with IBIS and a warm color tone, but overall sentiment is strongly positive.

Pros
  • Exceptional sharpness
  • Beautiful bokeh
  • Versatile macro and portrait
  • Solid build quality
  • Good value for money
Cons
  • Slow autofocus in macro
  • Noisy HSM motor
  • Focus hunting in low contrast
  • IBIS compatibility issues
  • Warm color tone
👍 Sharpness 12
🤔 Autofocus speed 8
👍 Macro performance 7
👍 Build quality 6
👍 Value for money 5
👍 Bokeh 4

Scores

Macro
Nikon
84
Sigma
91
Professional
Nikon
89
Sigma
84
Portrait
Nikon
88
Sigma
87
Budget
Nikon
84
Sigma
77
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Sigma
84
Street
Nikon
82
Sigma
72
Landscape
Nikon
78
Sigma
67
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
72
Sigma
74
Travel
Nikon
70
Sigma
57

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mmSigma Art 105mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Macro 105mm
Optics
Typezoommacro
Focal Length Min17 mm105 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm105 mm
Elements1317
Groups1112
Aspherical Elements3★1
ED Elements3★2
CoatingMulti-CoatedSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZCanon EF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.45 kg★0.71 kg
Filter Thread67 mm62 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★HSM
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—4 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★305 mm
Max Magnification1:5.261:1

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile

Sigma Art 105mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Macro 105mm

  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong optical (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Both products are similarly priced.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm0.004score per dollar
vs
Sigma Art 105mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Macro 105mm0.003score per dollar

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm offers 1.3x better value for money

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Sigma Art 105mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Macro 105mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 5 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelLandscapeProfessional

Sigma Art 105mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Macro 105mm Better at:

MacroVideo Cinema

Also Consider