Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Insta360 X5 CINSBAHB 6mm

Insta360 X5 CINSBAHB 6mm

Insta360
36 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Insta360
39
Budget
Nikon
85
Insta360
39
Street
Nikon
84
Insta360
44
Macro
Nikon
84
Insta360
19
Portrait
Nikon
84
Insta360
61
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Insta360
46
Landscape
Nikon
79
Insta360
16
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Insta360
31
Travel
Nikon
70
Insta360
17

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Insta360 X5 CINSBAHB 6mm
Optics
Typezoomfisheye
Focal Length Min17 mm6 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm6 mm
Elements13—
Groups11—
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements3★—
CoatingMulti-Coated—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades9★—
Build
MountNikon ZInsta360 X5
Formatfull-frame★—
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.45 kg★—
Filter Thread67 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★—
Stabilization✗—
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★—
Max Magnification1:5.26★—

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Insta360 X5 CINSBAHB 6mm

  • Strong aperture (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average build (32nd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Insta360 X5 CINSBAHB 6mm

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider