Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score
vs
Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon
91 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Nikon
86
Canon
97
Professional
Nikon
95
Canon
75
Portrait
Nikon
89
Canon
95
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Canon
90
Street
Nikon
86
Canon
82
Macro
Nikon
85
Canon
68
Landscape
Nikon
83
Canon
76
Travel
Nikon
75
Canon
81
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Canon
77

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm135 mm
Elements1316
Groups1112
Aspherical Elements31
ED Elements31
CoatingMulti-CoatedSuper Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/3.5
Min Aperturef/2.83.5-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades97
Build
MountNikon ZCanon EF-S
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.52 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorSTM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm390 mm
Max Magnification1:5.260.28x

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong optical (82nd percentile)82nd %ile

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

No current pricing available

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 4 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroStreetLandscapeProfessional

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Better at:

BudgetTravelPortraitVideo Cinema

Also Consider