Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Tamron SP A005 70-300mm

Tamron SP A005 70-300mm

Tamron
41 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Tamron
35
Macro
Nikon
88
Tamron
47
Budget
Nikon
85
Tamron
46
Street
Nikon
84
Tamron
34
Portrait
Nikon
84
Tamron
25
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Tamron
36
Landscape
Nikon
79
Tamron
49
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Tamron
41
Travel
Nikon
70
Tamron
42

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Tamron SP A005 70-300mm
Optics
Typezoomtelephoto
Focal Length Min17 mm70 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm300 mm
Elements1317
Groups1112
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements3★—
CoatingMulti-CoatedBBAR (Broad-Band Anti-Reflection)
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.832-45★
Min Aperturef/2.84-5.6
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZSony A
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.45 kg★0.77 kg
Filter Thread67 mm62 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★USD
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★1.50 m
Max Magnification1:5.261:4

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Tamron SP A005 70-300mm

  • Strong versatility (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (78th percentile)
  • Strong optical (76th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (7th percentile)7th %ile
  • Below average build (26th percentile)

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Tamron SP A005 70-300mm

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider