Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Sigma TS-71

Sigma TS-71

Sigma
46 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Sigma
39
Macro
Nikon
88
Sigma
23
Budget
Nikon
85
Sigma
48
Street
Nikon
84
Sigma
59
Portrait
Nikon
84
Sigma
53
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Sigma
44
Landscape
Nikon
79
Sigma
28
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Sigma
39
Travel
Nikon
70
Sigma
41

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Sigma TS-71
Optics
Typezoom—
Focal Length Min17 mm—
Focal Length Max28 mm—
Elements13—
Groups11—
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements3★—
CoatingMulti-Coated—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8—
Min Aperturef/2.8—
Constant✓★—
Diaphragm Blades9★—
Build
MountNikon Z—
Formatfull-frame★—
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.45 kg0.10 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★—
Stabilization✗—
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★—
Max Magnification1:5.26★—

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Sigma TS-71

  • Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong aperture (66th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Sigma TS-71 is MX$20,378 cheaper (5.6x less).

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.004score per dollar
vs
Sigma TS-710.010score per dollar

Sigma TS-71 offers 2.5x better value for money

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider