Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
NEEWER LS-30

NEEWER LS-30

NEEWER
47 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
NEEWER
40
Macro
Nikon
88
NEEWER
23
Budget
Nikon
85
NEEWER
49
Street
Nikon
84
NEEWER
60
Portrait
Nikon
84
NEEWER
53
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
NEEWER
44
Landscape
Nikon
79
NEEWER
28
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
NEEWER
40
Travel
Nikon
70
NEEWER
42

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8NEEWER LS-30
Optics
Typezoom—
Focal Length Min17 mm—
Focal Length Max28 mm—
Elements13—
Groups11—
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements3★—
CoatingMulti-Coated—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8—
Min Aperturef/2.8—
Constant✓★—
Diaphragm Blades9★—
Build
MountNikon Z—
Formatfull-frame★—
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.45 kg0.07 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★—
Stabilization✗—
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★—
Max Magnification1:5.26★—

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

NEEWER LS-30

  • Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong aperture (66th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

NEEWER LS-30 is MX$23,912 cheaper (28.7x less).

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.004score per dollar
vs
NEEWER LS-300.054score per dollar

NEEWER LS-30 offers 13.5x better value for money

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider