Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Sigma DG Macro 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG Macro

Sigma DG Macro 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG Macro

Sigma
60 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Sigma
51
Macro
Nikon
88
Sigma
66
Budget
Nikon
85
Sigma
61
Street
Nikon
84
Sigma
53
Portrait
Nikon
84
Sigma
63
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Sigma
54
Landscape
Nikon
79
Sigma
55
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Sigma
50
Travel
Nikon
70
Sigma
49

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Sigma DG Macro 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG Macro
Optics
Typezoomtelephoto
Focal Length Min17 mm70 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm300 mm
Elements1314
Groups1110
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements33
CoatingMulti-CoatedSuper Multi-Layer Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/4
Min Aperturef/2.84-5.6
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZCanon EF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.45 kg★0.55 kg
Filter Thread67 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★Auto and Manual Focus
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★950 mm
Max Magnification1:5.261:2

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Sigma DG Macro 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG Macro

  • Strong versatility (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Sigma DG Macro 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG Macro

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider