Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Art 35mm f/1.2 DG II 35mm
Sigma
75 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Macro
Portrait
Budget
Street
Video Cinema
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Specifications
| Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | Sigma Art 35mm f/1.2 DG II 35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 17 mm | 35 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 28 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | 13 | 17 |
| Groups | 11 | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3 | 4★ |
| ED Elements | 3★ | 1 |
| Coating | Multi-Coated | Water- & Oil-Repellent Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/1.2 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/1.2 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 11★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon Z | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.45 kg★ | 0.76 kg |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 72 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Stepping Motor★ | HLA-Driven High-Speed AF Motor |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 190 mm★ | 280 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.26 | 1:5.3 |
Pros & Cons
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
Sigma Art 35mm f/1.2 DG II 35mm
- Strong aperture (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong bokeh (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong optical (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong macro (75th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Pricing
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Sigma Art 35mm f/1.2 DG II 35mm
No current pricing available
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 91 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.
