Fujifilm XF 50mm f/2 R WR 50mm

Fujifilm XF 50mm f/2 R WR 50mm

Fujifilm
55 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
98 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Fujifilm
48
Sigma
100
Landscape
Fujifilm
51
Sigma
100
Budget
Fujifilm
61
Sigma
99
Travel
Fujifilm
60
Sigma
93
Video Cinema
Fujifilm
60
Sigma
90
Wildlife Sports
Fujifilm
66
Sigma
87
Portrait
Fujifilm
50
Sigma
85
Professional
Fujifilm
66
Sigma
84
Street
Fujifilm
69
Sigma
80

Specifications

Fujifilm XF 50mm f/2 R WR 50mmSigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min50 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm300 mm
Elements920
Groups714
Aspherical Elements14★
ED Elements15★
CoatingSuper EBCwater- and oil-repellent coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/3.5
Min Aperturef/23.5-6.7
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountFujifilm XSony E
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.20 kg★0.61 kg
Filter Thread46 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typestepping motor★HLA
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—6 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance390 mm170 mm★
Max Magnification0.15x1:2★

Pros & Cons

Fujifilm XF 50mm f/2 R WR 50mm

  • Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong macro (88th percentile)88th %ile

Pricing

Fujifilm XF 50mm f/2 R WR 50mm

No current pricing available

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Verdict

★ Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Scores 98 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider