Canon RF16mm F2.8 STM 16mm
Canon
56 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm
Fujifilm
82 Overall Score
Scores
Street
Professional
Portrait
Video Cinema
Budget
Macro
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Landscape
Specifications
| Canon RF16mm F2.8 STM 16mm | Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 35 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 16 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | 9 | 9 |
| Groups | 7 | 6 |
| Aspherical Elements | 1 | 2★ |
| ED Elements | — | 2★ |
| Coating | Super Spectra Coating | Nano-GI coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/2 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon RF | Fujifilm X |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.17 kg | 0.13 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 43 mm | 43 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | STM★ | stepping motor |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 130 mm★ | 350 mm |
| Max Magnification | 0.26x | 1:7★ |
Pros & Cons
Canon RF16mm F2.8 STM 16mm
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average bokeh (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm
- Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong bokeh (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong aperture (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Pricing
Canon RF16mm F2.8 STM 16mm0.008score per dollar
vs
Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm0.010score per dollar
Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm offers 1.3x better value for money
Canon RF16mm F2.8 STM 16mm
Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm
Verdict
Winner: Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm
Scores 82 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.
