Sigma 736101 50-500mm

Sigma 736101 50-500mm

Sigma
45 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-75mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-75mm f/2.8

Nikon
66 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Sigma
37
Nikon
77
Budget
Sigma
55
Nikon
73
Landscape
Sigma
47
Nikon
69
Professional
Sigma
46
Nikon
69
Travel
Sigma
39
Nikon
64
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
46
Nikon
63
Video Cinema
Sigma
47
Nikon
60
Portrait
Sigma
60
Nikon
45
Street
Sigma
52
Nikon
58

Specifications

Sigma 736101 50-500mmNikon NIKKOR Z 28-75mm f/2.8
Optics
Typetelephotozoom
Focal Length Min50 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max500 mm75 mm
Elements2015
Groups1612
Aspherical Elements—3★
ED Elements4★2
Coatingsuper coatingantifouling coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/22
Min Aperture4-6.3f/2.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades—9★
Build
MountCanon EFNikon Z
Format—full-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight1.86 kg0.56 kg★
Filter Thread—67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeHSMStepping Motor★
Stabilization—✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance—190 mm★
Max Magnification—1:2.94★

Pros & Cons

Sigma 736101 50-500mm

  • Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong aperture (66th percentile)
  • Below average build (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average social proof (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-75mm f/2.8

  • Strong optical (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong macro (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

Pricing

Sigma 736101 50-500mm

No current pricing available

Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-75mm f/2.8

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-75mm f/2.8

Scores 66 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.

Sigma 736101 50-500mm Better at:

Portrait

Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-75mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider