Fujifilm XF 60mm f/2.4 R Macro 60mm

Fujifilm XF 60mm f/2.4 R Macro 60mm

Fujifilm
50 Overall Score
vs
Sigma 207975

Sigma 207975

Sigma
85 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Fujifilm
43
Sigma
86
Street
Fujifilm
54
Sigma
86
Macro
Fujifilm
68
Sigma
82
Portrait
Fujifilm
38
Sigma
81
Travel
Fujifilm
55
Sigma
80
Budget
Fujifilm
50
Sigma
75
Video Cinema
Fujifilm
39
Sigma
74
Landscape
Fujifilm
44
Sigma
71
Wildlife Sports
Fujifilm
41
Sigma
66

Specifications

Fujifilm XF 60mm f/2.4 R Macro 60mmSigma 207975
Optics
Typemacrowide-angle-zoom
Focal Length Min60 mm10 mm
Focal Length Max60 mm18 mm
Elements1013
Groups810
Aspherical Elements11
ED Elements14
CoatingSuper EBCSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.4f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades97
Build
MountFujifilm XSony E
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.21 kg0.26 kg
Filter Thread39 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusAutofocus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance267 mm117 mm
Max Magnification1:21:4

Pros & Cons

Fujifilm XF 60mm f/2.4 R Macro 60mm

  • Strong build (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong macro (76th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (74th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Sigma 207975

  • Strong macro (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong optical (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)

Pricing

Both products are similarly priced.

Fujifilm XF 60mm f/2.4 R Macro 60mm0.003score per dollar
vs
Sigma 2079750.006score per dollar

Sigma 207975 offers 2.0x better value for money

Fujifilm XF 60mm f/2.4 R Macro 60mm

Verdict

Winner: Sigma 207975

Scores 85 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Sigma 207975 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider