Fujifilm XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR 16mm

Fujifilm XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR 16mm

Fujifilm
76 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Nikon
91 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Fujifilm XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR 16mm

72 out of 100 medium confidence 14 reviews

The Fuji XF 24mm f/2.8 lens is widely praised for its compact size, light weight, and excellent image quality, especially for travel and outdoor photography. Users highlight its sharpness, micro contrast, and weather sealing, though some note softness at wide apertures and mediocre indoor performance. A few reviewers find it less impressive compared to faster or wider alternatives, but overall it is considered a versatile and portable prime lens.

Pros
  • Compact and lightweight design
  • Excellent sharpness and micro contrast
  • Great for travel and outdoor photography
  • Weather-sealed build
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
Cons
  • Soft at wide apertures
  • Mediocre indoor performance
  • Lacks manual focus switch
  • Bokeh not as good as f/1.4 version
  • Some find it less sharp than alternatives
👍 Image quality 6
👍 Portability 5
👍 Build quality 4
🤔 Sharpness 5
🤔 Aperture performance 4
👍 Autofocus 2

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

92 out of 100 medium confidence 11 reviews

The Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 lens is highly praised for its sharpness, compact size, and excellent low-light performance. Users love its versatility for travel, video, and long exposures, often pairing it with other lenses in the budget trinity. A few note it's not as premium as the S-line or Nikon 14-30mm, but most agree it offers incredible value for the price.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Excellent low-light performance
  • Great value for money
  • Versatile for travel and video
Cons
  • Not as premium as S-line lenses
  • Some prefer wider 14-30mm range
  • Build not as exceptional as premium trinity
👍 Image quality 8
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Value for money 6
👍 Low light performance 4
👍 Size and weight 5
👍 Versatility 5

Scores

Professional
Fujifilm
77
Nikon
89
Macro
Fujifilm
88
Nikon
84
Portrait
Fujifilm
60
Nikon
87
Budget
Fujifilm
74
Nikon
84
Travel
Fujifilm
83
Nikon
70
Street
Fujifilm
76
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Fujifilm
74
Nikon
82
Landscape
Fujifilm
76
Nikon
82
Wildlife Sports
Fujifilm
70
Nikon
72

Specifications

Fujifilm XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR 16mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min16 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max16 mm28 mm
Elements1013
Groups811
Aspherical Elements23★
ED Elements—3★
CoatingSuper EBC multi-layer coatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountFujifilm XNikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.15 kg★0.45 kg
Filter Thread49 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typestepping motorStepping Motor
Stabilization✓★✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance16 mm★190 mm
Max Magnification1:7.71:5.26

Pros & Cons

Fujifilm XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR 16mm

  • Strong macro (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile

Pricing

Fujifilm XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR 16mm is MX$14,236 cheaper (2.4x less).

Fujifilm XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR 16mm0.007score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm0.004score per dollar

Fujifilm XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR 16mm offers 1.8x better value for money

Fujifilm XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR 16mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 21 specs.

Fujifilm XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR 16mm Better at:

MacroTravel

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm Better at:

BudgetStreetPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider