Fujifilm XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR 16mm
Fujifilm
61 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
91 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Budget
Street
Macro
Portrait
Video Cinema
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Specifications
| Fujifilm XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR 16mm | Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | wide-angle | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 16 mm | 28 mm |
| Elements | 10 | 13 |
| Groups | 8 | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | 2 | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 3★ |
| Coating | Super EBC | Multi-Coated |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Nikon Z |
| Format | APS-C | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.15 kg★ | 0.45 kg |
| Filter Thread | 49 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | stepping motor | Stepping Motor |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 170 mm★ | 190 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:7.7 | 1:5.26 |
Pros & Cons
Fujifilm XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR 16mm
- Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong build (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong macro (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
Pricing
Fujifilm XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR 16mm0.006score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.004score per dollar
Fujifilm XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR 16mm offers 1.5x better value for money
Fujifilm XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR 16mm
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 21 specs.
