Tamron Di III 16-30mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2

Tamron Di III 16-30mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2

Tamron
77 Overall Score
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Panasonic
87 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Tamron Di III 16-30mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2

85 out of 100 medium confidence 24 reviews

The Tamron 16-30mm f/2.8 G2 lens is highly praised for astrophotography and landscape work, with users noting excellent sharpness, fast autofocus, and solid build quality. The infinity lock and programmable function button are standout features, though some users mention a rendering change at 30mm and the need for firmware updates on Nikon Z cameras. Overall, it is seen as a great value alternative to native lenses, especially for its lightweight design and consistent f/2.8 aperture.

Pros
  • Excellent sharpness
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
  • Lightweight and compact design
  • Solid build quality
  • Infinity lock for astrophotography
Cons
  • Rendering change at 30mm f/2.8
  • Requires firmware update for Nikon Z cameras
  • Limited documentation included
  • Distortion at 16mm for people photos
👍 Sharpness 6
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Autofocus performance 4
👍 Weight and portability 5
👍 Value for money 4
👎 Firmware compatibility 3

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

75 out of 100 medium confidence 10 reviews

The Panasonic Lumix S 28-200mm f/4-7.1 MACRO O.I.S. lens is widely praised for its compact size, versatile zoom range, and macro capability, making it an ideal travel companion. Users appreciate the optical stabilization and the convenience of not swapping lenses, though some note softness at extreme ends and a slow aperture. Overall, it's a solid all-in-one solution for outdoor and travel photography.

Pros
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Versatile zoom range (28-200mm)
  • Macro capability
  • Effective optical stabilization
  • Convenient all-in-one travel lens
Cons
  • Soft at wide and telephoto ends
  • Slow maximum aperture (f/4-7.1)
  • Not ideal for low light without stabilization
  • Requires stopping down for sharpness
👍 Compactness 5
👍 Versatility 4
🤔 Image quality 4
👎 Aperture speed 4
👍 Stabilization 3
👍 Macro capability 2

Scores

Macro
Tamron
80
Panasonic
96
Budget
Tamron
71
Panasonic
91
Landscape
Tamron
78
Panasonic
90
Travel
Tamron
64
Panasonic
87
Video Cinema
Tamron
81
Panasonic
86
Professional
Tamron
81
Panasonic
80
Portrait
Tamron
81
Panasonic
81
Street
Tamron
74
Panasonic
79
Wildlife Sports
Tamron
61
Panasonic
77

Specifications

Tamron Di III 16-30mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Optics
Typewide-anglezoom
Focal Length Min16 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max30 mm200 mm
Elements1617
Groups1213
Aspherical Elements3★1
ED Elements34★
Coatingfluorine-coated front elementFluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/4
Min Aperturef/2.84-7.1
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZL-Mount
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.44 kg0.41 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeVXD (Voice-coil eXtreme-torque Drive)Autofocus
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—6.5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm140 mm★
Max Magnification1:5.4★0.5x

Pros & Cons

Tamron Di III 16-30mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2

  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong macro (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Below average social proof (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average stabilization (35th percentile)

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

  • Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

Pricing

Both products are similarly priced.

Tamron Di III 16-30mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Scores 87 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelLandscapeVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider