KIPON Colibri 35mm T2.5 35mm

KIPON Colibri 35mm T2.5 35mm

KIPON
30 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
98 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
KIPON
38
Sigma
100
Landscape
KIPON
17
Sigma
100
Budget
KIPON
25
Sigma
99
Travel
KIPON
20
Sigma
93
Video Cinema
KIPON
28
Sigma
90
Wildlife Sports
KIPON
17
Sigma
87
Portrait
KIPON
28
Sigma
85
Professional
KIPON
25
Sigma
84
Street
KIPON
25
Sigma
80

Specifications

KIPON Colibri 35mm T2.5 35mmSigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm300 mm
Elements—20
Groups—14
Aspherical Elements—4★
ED Elements—5★
Coating—water- and oil-repellent coating
Aperture
Max ApertureT16f/3.5
Min ApertureT2.53.5-6.7
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades10★9
Build
MountCanon RFSony E
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.40 kg★0.61 kg
Filter Thread77 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyHLA
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—6 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance330 mm170 mm★
Max Magnification—1:2★

Pros & Cons

KIPON Colibri 35mm T2.5 35mm

  • Strong macro (68th percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong macro (88th percentile)88th %ile

Pricing

KIPON Colibri 35mm T2.5 35mm

No current pricing available

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Verdict

★ Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Scores 98 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider