Viltrox 28mm F4.5 XF 28mm

Viltrox 28mm F4.5 XF 28mm

Viltrox
62 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Nikon
91 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Viltrox 28mm F4.5 XF 28mm

72 out of 100 medium confidence 20 reviews

The Viltrox AF 28mm f/4.5 pancake lens is widely praised for its ultra-compact size, lightweight design, and excellent value, making it a favorite for street photography and travel. Users note it turns a full-frame camera into a highly portable setup, though the fixed f/4.5 aperture and lack of manual focus ring are limiting for some. Image quality is considered good for the price, but low-light performance and autofocus in dim conditions are common drawbacks. A few users reported a stuck rear lens cap or battery drain on certain Sony models, but overall sentiment is positive for its intended casual use.

Pros
  • Ultra-compact and lightweight design
  • Excellent value for the price
  • Great for street photography and travel
  • Sharp image quality for its class
  • Built-in lens cover
Cons
  • Fixed f/4.5 aperture
  • No manual focus ring
  • Poor low-light autofocus
  • Battery drain on Sony A5100
  • Stuck rear lens cap issue
👍 Portability 12
👍 Value for money 10
🤔 Image quality 8
👎 Fixed aperture 5
🤔 Autofocus performance 5
👎 Low light performance 4

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

92 out of 100 medium confidence 11 reviews

The Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 lens is highly praised for its sharpness, compact size, and excellent low-light performance. Users love its versatility for travel, video, and long exposures, often pairing it with other lenses in the budget trinity. A few note it's not as premium as the S-line or Nikon 14-30mm, but most agree it offers incredible value for the price.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Excellent low-light performance
  • Great value for money
  • Versatile for travel and video
Cons
  • Not as premium as S-line lenses
  • Some prefer wider 14-30mm range
  • Build not as exceptional as premium trinity
👍 Image quality 8
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Value for money 6
👍 Low light performance 4
👍 Size and weight 5
👍 Versatility 5

Scores

Professional
Viltrox
71
Nikon
88
Portrait
Viltrox
63
Nikon
86
Macro
Viltrox
52
Nikon
84
Budget
Viltrox
64
Nikon
84
Street
Viltrox
72
Nikon
82
Landscape
Viltrox
68
Nikon
81
Video Cinema
Viltrox
70
Nikon
81
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
61
Nikon
72
Travel
Viltrox
68
Nikon
70

Specifications

Viltrox 28mm F4.5 XF 28mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min28 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm28 mm
Elements613
Groups611
Aspherical Elements23★
ED Elements23★
CoatingHD Nano CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4.5f/2.8
Min Aperturef/4.5f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades69★
Build
MountFujifilm XNikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.06 kg★0.45 kg
Filter Thread—67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeVCMStepping Motor★
Stabilization✓★✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance340 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification0.1x1:5.26★

Pros & Cons

Viltrox 28mm F4.5 XF 28mm

  • Strong build (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong social proof (67th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average macro (31st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average stabilization (35th percentile)

Pricing

Viltrox 28mm F4.5 XF 28mm is MX$22,716 cheaper (13.7x less).

Viltrox 28mm F4.5 XF 28mm0.034score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm0.004score per dollar

Viltrox 28mm F4.5 XF 28mm offers 8.5x better value for money

Viltrox 28mm F4.5 XF 28mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider