Viltrox AF 28/4.5 FE 28mm

Viltrox AF 28/4.5 FE 28mm

Viltrox
64 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm

Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm

Tamron
68 Overall Score

Scores

Travel
Viltrox
66
Tamron
78
Macro
Viltrox
62
Tamron
76
Budget
Viltrox
66
Tamron
76
Street
Viltrox
73
Tamron
63
Landscape
Viltrox
62
Tamron
73
Professional
Viltrox
72
Tamron
60
Portrait
Viltrox
65
Tamron
52
Video Cinema
Viltrox
62
Tamron
59
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
58
Tamron
61

Specifications

Viltrox AF 28/4.5 FE 28mmTamron Di II A14M 18-200mm
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min28 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm200 mm
Elements617
Groups613
Aspherical Elements23
ED Elements22
Coatingmultilayer nanocoatingInternal Surface coatings, multiple-layered coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4.5f/18
Min Aperturef/4.53.5-6.3
Constant
Diaphragm Blades7
Build
MountSony ENikon F
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.06 kg0.40 kg
Filter Thread62 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusAuto Focus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance350 mm498 mm
Max Magnification1:101:3.7

Pros & Cons

Viltrox AF 28/4.5 FE 28mm

  • Strong build (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong social proof (74th percentile)
  • Strong macro (65th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm

  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average bokeh (21st percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

Pricing

Viltrox AF 28/4.5 FE 28mm

Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm

No current pricing available

Verdict

Winner: Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm

Scores 68 overall, wins 5 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 21 specs.

Viltrox AF 28/4.5 FE 28mm Better at:

StreetPortraitProfessionalVideo Cinema

Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm Better at:

MacroBudgetTravelLandscapeWildlife Sports

Also Consider