Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Sony
89 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm
Fujifilm
82 Overall Score
Scores
Travel
Street
Budget
Video Cinema
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Portrait
Landscape
Macro
Specifications
| Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS | Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 35 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 50 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | 9 | 9 |
| Groups | 8 | 6 |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | 2 |
| ED Elements | 1 | 2★ |
| Coating | — | Nano-GI coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/2 |
| Min Aperture | 3.5-5.6 | f/2 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Fujifilm X |
| Format | APS-C | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.11 kg★ | 0.13 kg |
| Filter Thread | 41 mm | 43 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | stepping motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Stabilization Stops | 4 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm★ | 350 mm |
| Max Magnification | 0.215x | 1:7★ |
Pros & Cons
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm
- Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong bokeh (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong aperture (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Pricing
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.027score per dollar
vs
Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm0.010score per dollar
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS offers 2.7x better value for money
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm
Verdict
Winner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Scores 89 overall, wins 5 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.
